紀要論文

小特集「大連シンポジウム2011」 : 古代東アジア世界のなかの日本の自国認識 : 大唐帝国は日本律令国家の「隣国」か「蕃国」か

Special Issue : Self-consciousness of Japan in the Ancient East Asian Nations: Is the Great Tang Dynasty "Neighbouring Country" or "Barbarian Country" of Japan as the Ritsuryo-code-based Nation?

jpn

18838596

https://doi.org/10.15002/00022455

法政大学国際日本学研究所

10

304(45)

285(64)

2013-03-29

Version of Record

小特集「大連シンポジウム2011」

TIn this article we tried to summarize previous studies on the imperialistic self-consciousness of Ancient Japan from following two aspects: how did they deal the Great Tang Dynasty and barbarians in Japan under such recognition. In interpretations of the ancient Ritsuryo-code, the Great Tang Dynasty was recognized as Ringoku (neighbouring country) or Bankoku (barbarian country). It would be easy to understand that Japan’s self-assertion was to aim some independence from the Tang Dynasty regardless of actual conditions of power relationships between Japan and the Tang Dynasty, or actual treatment of the Tang Dynasty to Japan. On the other hand, it is diverse over barbarians to recognize the as Kegai (out of state reign) or Kenai (sphere of sovereignty). However taking an overall look at the political foundations of the ancient Ritsuryo-code-based Nation, whatever the actual conditions, it might be thought that Iteki (barbarians) was consistently the object of conquest and enlightenment and their existence was essential for the government of ancient Japan to keep the structure as the imperial nation. As a result, since ancient Japan intended to establish the structure as the imperial nation, it would be adequate to understand that the Great Tang Dynasty was recognized as barbarian country and barbarians Banzoku (savage tribe) as a subjective concept.

Article

AA11914954